Abstract
In the present case study, the hydrodynamic aspects of a planing hull were investigated using RANS method and compared with the well-known Savitsky's technique. The total resistance and the trim angle computed by RANS simulation and Savitsky's method were investigated at different volumetric Froude numbers and eventually compared with experimental results. The results show that the presented RANS simulation has an acceptable agreement with the experimental results and the computed total resistance and trim angles are approximately equal to the measured values of the previous reference. The simulation errors are less than the previously published references. The mean error percentage for resistance, trim, and sinkage are 2.77%, 9.17% and 12.01% respectively. Finally, the results of the wetted lengths computed by Savitsky's method are not as accurate as of the RANS method. A comparison between the RANS method and Savitsky's method showed that the numerical approach is more accurate and reliable than the semi-empirical method. It should be noted that each of these methods has its own strengths. That is the Savitsky's method computes the results in a short computational time, while the RANS method requires more computational time and can represent the fluid flow characteristics with more details.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.