Abstract

ObjectiveThe comparison of the efficiency of shunt placement and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in treating of adult hydrocephalus patients with various intensities and different obstruction intensities in the aqueduct of Sylvius (AS). MethodsIn vitro models with separated ventricles were simulated and implemented for modeling shunt and ETV surgeries in one healthy subject and hydrocephalus patients with various intensities, as well as three different obstruction intensities in AS and under two cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamic conditions. The fluid-structure interaction simulation was also carried out to validate in vitro results. ResultsThe efficiency of both methods in reducing the maximum CSF pressure in the subarachnoid space (MCPS) decreased by an increase in the patient's intensities. Contrary to shunting, the efficiency of ETV in reducing MCPS demonstrated a decline (8.3–16.4%) by an increase in obstruction levels in AS. Based on the findings, shunt efficiency in decreasing MCPS in patients with low intensity was more remarkable compared to ETV. However, ETV was more efficient than shunt in the patient with intracranial hypertension. Further, shunt placement and ETV led to a significant reduction in the amplitude of CSF pressure in the SAS (ACPS) in patients with sneezing, coughing, Valsalva maneuver, and exercising effects in contrast to other patients. Moreover, ACPS reduction was not related to the intensity of the disease in both treatment methods. In contrast to shunt, an increase in the obstruction level in AS led to a reduction in ACPS in ETV in both CSF dynamic conditions. ConclusionsThe noises from irregular disorders increased the discharging of CSF after shunt placement, and activities such as sneezing, coughing, Valsalva maneuvers, and exercising increased the risk of shunt overdrainage by 10.4~47.8%, especially in the patient with intracranial hypertension. Based on the proposed in vitro ETV and shunt models, an increase of head compliance was higher in ETV compared to the shunt. Eventually, an increase in the obstruction level of AS after ETV led to a decline in head compliance in contrast to shunt.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.