Hydroconsolidation and subsidence of loess: Studies from China, Russia, North America and Europe: In memory of Jan Sajgalik

Abstract

Various approaches to the widespread problem of the hydroconsolidation and subsidence of loess have been suggested. These include considerations of rheology, thermodynamics, phase movements, particle packing, interparticle bonding, pore structure and distribution, catastrophe theory, topology, and simple structural frameworks. Chinese, North American and most European investigators tend to concentrate on mechanisms of loess collapse. The Russian literature, however, retains an extra dimension. Two approaches, the ‘syngenetic’ and the ‘epigenetic’ approach, to the formation of subsiding loess have been defined in the literature. Most investigators follow a syngenetic approach which appears to be a consequence of the aeolian idea of loess deposition. Some Russian writers, in contrast, promote an epigenetic approach in which collapsibility can develop in an originally noncollapsible material, which can then suffer from hydroconsolidation and subsidence. The basis of the phenomenon is a change in the packing structure of the major loess particles, and this can be modelled using simple Monte Carlo methods to develop appropriate structures. This paper aims to review the work done on this important subject. Serious investigation of hydroconsolidation and subsidence of loess began in the early nineteen-forties, fifty years ago, and this has been reported in a piecemeal manner. A detailed, critical review of this diverse work is now overdue and this is presented herein in the light of recent work in the United Kingdom. An attempt is made to describe the process in a phenomenological and a structural sense. Inherent in this, the role of N. Ya Denisov as ‘subsidence pioneer’ is considered.