Abstract
Source rocks on‐structure in the October field are not sufficiently mature to have expelled hydrocarbons at the present day. l‐D modelling of a pseudo‐well in the deep October South Trough demonstrates that the Eocene Thebes and Senonian Sudr Formations are presently mature at depths greater than 3km. However, only the carbonate‐rich Sudr Formation has generated sufficient hydrocarbons for expulsion to take place at depths shallower than 3.5km, suggesting that reservoired oil in the October field originates predominantly from source rocks of this unit. Model results indicate that hydrocarbon expulsion from this source may have commenced as early as 20Ma in kitchen depocentres adjacent to the October field, and continued through the Pliocene.Migration routes predicted from 2‐D modelling are complex and require downward expulsion from the Sudr Formation east and west of the October field to charge the Palaeozoic Nubian Sandstone. Mature Sudr Formation in the October South Trough first charges the Nubian and then lower Senonian Matulla Formation reservoirs in the NW compartments of the October field via flow across the NW bounding fault. The mature Sudr Formation in the Baba Trough to the SE charged the Matulla Sandstones on the eastern flanks of the October field which then back‐filled to spill into the Nubian Sandstones. Hydrocarbons generated from the Thebes Formation contribute only minor volumes to the predicted accumulations.The presence of trap‐bounding faults and their sealing properties is shown to be a key sensitivity for charging the October field and related structures. Fault seal is required to charge known accumulations and match known hydrocarbon column heights, but extending shale smear into the Nubian Sandstone prevents the crestal October field structure from charging.The Matulla Formation sandstones are a regional migration fairway providing charge for the Ras Budran field and Nubian Sandstone prospects to the west of the October field. Younger Mesozoic sandstones are charged by vertical migration through seals and along faults. This regional migration sequence as described for the October field is likely to Maher Ayyad of BG Egypt very kindly gave access to the seismic cross section used in the study, as well as guiding our understanding of the regional geology of the Gulf of Suez, and also provided a constructive review of the manuscript. EGPC generously provided access to well data and support for Magdi El‐Ghamri. Colin Harwood (BG Group) and Dan Carruthers and John Bunney (Permedia Research Group Inc.) commented on early drafts of the manuscript. BG Group is thanked for permission to publish.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.