Abstract

The suitability of a location for an on-site wastewater treatment process (for areas which lack access to centralised wastewater treatment systems) requires an assessment of the permeability of the soil into which the effluent will be discharged. In many jurisdictions this is determined using some type of in-situ percolation test. Falling head percolation tests, which give a value of percolation time (PT) that is empirically related to the notion of hydraulic conductivity, are widely used as they are relatively simple to carry out, but the test does not have a sound theoretical framework and test methods are not standardised internationally. In comparison, the saturated hydraulic conductivity of a soil obtained from a constant head well permeameter test is independent of test conditions, and so is a more suitable metric for design. A database of over 900 falling head tests carried out across a range of different subsoil types in Ireland has been collated, all with the inherent limitations of the existing regulative framework regarding the percolation test and soil texture assessment. These tests were then modelled using Hydrus 2-D numerical modelling simulations to determine equivalent field saturated hydraulic conductivity (Kfs) values and thereby provide a correlation with PT values across the range of subsoil conditions. In addition, falling head tests have been carried out in parallel to constant head permeameter tests in the field and compared against the relationship derived from the broad dataset of simulated results. This revealed an optimal solution by which to determine Kfs from the field permeameter test (using parameters recommended for most structured soils from clays to loams). The trendline based on Irish data was also compared against more generic formulations of the relationship between PT, and Kfs and shown to match closely, particularly the Reynolds (2016) ‘unified’ methodology. Finally, the Irish threshold PT limits for on-site wastewater treatment have been converted to Kfs values and compared against other international standards.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call