Abstract

Background: Although there is a well documented negative effect of dehydration on exercise performance, athletes commonly start their exercise inadequately hydrated. This fact suggests that athletes do not adequately replenish their fluids and we can also speculate that they are unable to properly estimate their beverage intake. Objective: To evaluate the hydration status, the beverage intake, and differences between perceived adequate fluid intake and laboratory indicator of hydration status in elite deaf athletes. Methods: It was a cross-sectional study. The research group consisted of 62 male athletes organized in the Czech Deaf Sports Federation at the age of 25.8 ± 8.3 years. Urine specific gravity (USG) was an indicator of hydration status. Beverage consumption and its subjective evaluation were questioned. Results: The prevalence of inadequate hydration was 54%, athletes reported common beverage intake 2.2 ± 0.9 L, plus 1.0 ± 0.5 L in relation to their practice. A negative correlation was revealed between beverages daily intake and USG (r = -.51, p < .001). Fifteen (24%) athletes assessed their beverage consumption as very good, 43 (69%) as good, and only 4 (6%) as poor. There was no significant (p = .950, η2 = .002) association between perceived beverage consumption and USG. Conclusions: The majority of athletes was dehydrated based on their first morning urine sample. Athletes failed to subjectively evaluate their beverage consumption and perceived it as better than what the objective laboratory indicator (USG) showed.

Highlights

  • There is a rich scientific literature regarding hydration status and physical performance

  • A negative correlation was revealed between daily beverage intake and Urine specific gravity (USG) (r = –.51, p < .001, large effect; Figure 1). 38 (61 %) athletes met the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) guidance for minimum beverages (≥2 L/day)

  • When comparing hydration status in athletes stratified by compliance with fluid intake guidance we found a significantly higher incidence of dehydration in the group that did not meet the consumption of 2 L/day (p = .003, Φ = .43, medium effect; Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is a rich scientific literature regarding hydration status and physical performance. Fluid needs can differ greatly among individuals due to variation in the factors that influence both water loss and solute balance, there is a widespread consensus regarding the methods of evaluation of hydration status in athletes and the rate of fluid consumption. There is a well documented negative effect of dehydration on exercise performance, athletes commonly start their exercise inadequately hydrated. This fact suggests that athletes do not adequately replenish their fluids and we can speculate that they are unable to properly estimate their beverage intake. Athletes failed to subjectively evaluate their beverage consumption and perceived it as better than what the objective laboratory indicator (USG) showed

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call