Abstract

The aim of nuclear safeguards is to ensure that special nuclear material is used for peaceful purposes. Historically, nuclear material accounting (NMA) has provided the quantitative basis for monitoring for nuclear material loss or diversion, and process monitoring (PM) data is collected by the operator to monitor the process. PM data typically support NMA in various ways, often by providing a basis to estimate some of the in-process nuclear material inventory. We develop options for combining PM residuals and NMA residuals (residual = measurement − prediction), using a hybrid of period-driven and data-driven hypothesis testing. The modified statistical tests can be used on time series of NMA residuals (the NMA residual is the familiar material balance), or on a combination of PM and NMA residuals. The PM residuals can be generated on a fixed time schedule or as events occur.

Highlights

  • Introduction and BackgroundNuclear material accounting (NMA) is a component of nuclear safeguards, which are designed to detect illicit diversion of special nuclear material (SNM) from the peaceful fuel cycle to a potential weapons application

  • The requirement for high-quality predictions leads to technical challenges in safeguarding either aqueous or electrochemical reprocessing facilities

  • There is ongoing work aimed at high-quality modeling of the electrorefiner in an electrochemical facility [17]

Read more

Summary

Introduction and Background

Nuclear material accounting (NMA) is a component of nuclear safeguards, which are designed to detect illicit diversion of special nuclear material (SNM) from the peaceful fuel cycle to a potential weapons application. Both PM and NMA measurements are available at aqueous and electrochemical reprocessing facilities. One key assumption is that the safeguards approach includes model-based predictions that can be compared to corresponding measurements, resulting in time series of residuals. The requirement for high-quality predictions leads to technical challenges in safeguarding either aqueous or electrochemical reprocessing facilities. The following sections include a description of NMA and of PM, pattern recognition, model-based prediction, discussion of simulated data, extensions to include additional PM residuals, example of combining PM and NMA data, and a summary. Reference [1] reviews related work in the nuclear safeguards and statistics communities

NMA and PM
Flow Rate Monitoring and Event Marking
Model-Based Predictions
Data Fusion
Hybrid of Period-Driven and Data-Driven Pattern Recognition
Pattern Recognition
Example
Conclusions and Summary
Data-Driven Hypothesis Testing
Hybrid of Period-Driven and Data-Driven Testing
Findings
Pattern Recognition for NMA and PM Data
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.