Hybrid fixation versus conventional cage-plate construct in 3-level ACDF: Introduce the “seesaw theory” of stand-alone cage

Abstract

Study designA retrospective study. BackgroundConventional cage-plate construct (CCP) was widely used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), but the rigid fixation limits the motion of fused segments. Self-locking stand-alone cage (SSC) was an alternative for ACDF procedures and showed several superiorities. However, the effect of hybrid fixation in 3-level ACDF remains unknown. ObjectiveTo assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of hybrid fixation with SSC and CCP against conventional CCP in 3-level ACDF. MethodA retrospective review of patients who underwent 3-level ACDF at Renji Hospital between January 2018 and December 2019 was performed. Eighty-three patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were stratified into 2 groups based on the fixation methods. The clinical outcomes, functional outcomes, and radiological parameters were collected and analyzed. ResultsNo significant difference was observed between the two groups in the mean age, sex, body mass index, hospital stay, and duration of follow-up. The postoperative C2–7 Cobb angle in the CCP group was significantly greater than that in the hybrid group. The rate of cervical proximal junctional kyphosis (CPJK) in the hybrid group was significantly lower than that in the CCP group. The CCP group suffered significantly higher rates of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) than the hybrid group at 2 years postoperatively. Moreover, the incidence of postoperative dysphagia was lower in the hybrid group. No significant differences were observed in JOA and NDI scores between the two groups. ConclusionThe hybrid fixation achieved comparable clinical outcomes against CCP fixation, indicating that hybrid fixation is an alternative procedure in 3-level ACDF.