Abstract

NBO analysis and hybrid density functional theory–based method (B3LYP/6-311+G**) was used to study the anomeric effects (AE), dipole–dipole interactions, and steric repulsion effects on the conformational properties of 2,3,5,6-tetrahalo-1,4-dioxane [halo = F (1), Cl (2), Br (3)], 2,3,5,6-tetrahalo-1,4-dithiane [halo = F (4), Cl (5), Br (6)], and 2,3,5,6-etrahalo-1,4-diselenane [halo = F (7), Cl (8), Br (9)]. B3LYP/6-311+G** results revealed a strong axial preference in compounds 1–3. Gibbs free energy difference (G eq–G ax) values (e.g., ΔG eq-ax) between the axial and equatorial conformations of compound 1 to compound 3 are 8.19, 3.86, and 3.13 kcal mol−1, respectively, as calculated by the B3LYP/6-311+G** level of theory. On the other hand, the NBO analysis of donor–acceptor (bond–antibond) interactions revealed that the AE for compounds 1–3 are −12.26, −16.46, and −18.11 kcal mol−1, respectively. Contrary to the increase of the AE values from compound 1 to compound 3, the increase of the steric repulsions (e.g., 1,3-syn-axial repulsions) could fairly explain the decrease of the axial conformation stability in compounds 1–3 compared to their equatorial conformations. Further, the correlations between the AE, structural parameters, and conformational behavior of compounds 4–9 have been investigated.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.