Hut at Strathmore – TWAIL for a Culturally Appropriate Teaching of Public International Law in African Law Schools

Arnold Nciko

doi:10.52907/slr.v6i1.163

Abstract

The teaching of Public International Law (PIL) in African law schools is backward. While Article 13 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights demands that, for education to be acceptable, it must also be culturally appropriate, the teaching of PIL in our schools is largely only reflective of European westernisation. This study reviews relevant literature in law, sociology, international relations, history and politics, and rely on surveys on PIL syllabi in select leading African law schools to attempt to make this violation more explicit. As a recommendation of a possible way forward, the study provides PIL as taught in the Hut at Strathmore Law School. The Hut is an intellectual movement within Strathmore Law School that has tried to contextualise Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL) to Africa.

Highlights

‘As a third world scholar, the only ethical relationship I can have with Eurocentric international law is one of objection and I choose to articulate this dissent by invoking the teaching of critical international law in these spaces’
As a recommendation of a possible way forward, the study provides Public International Law (PIL) as taught in the Hut at Strathmore Law School.The Hut is an intellectual movement within Strathmore Law School that has tried to contextualise Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL) to Africa
The Hut has not been immune to criticism

Summary

Introduction

‘As a third world scholar, the only ethical relationship I can have with Eurocentric international law is one of objection and I choose to articulate this dissent by invoking the teaching of critical international law in these spaces’.1.

Results

Conclusion