Abstract

The modified dynamic approach, where the observation vector and design matrix of observation equation are simultaneously filtered by empirical parameters, is implemented in this study. Using approximately 13years (spanning from January 2003 to April 2015) of Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) Level 1B data published by JPL and kinematic orbits published by ITSG, we developed a new GRACE static gravity field model called HUST-Grace2016s complete to degree and order 160. To evaluate the quality of our model, other GRACE-only gravity field models including AIUB-GRACE03S, GGM05S, ITG-Grace2010s, ITSG-Grace2014s and Tongji-GRACE01, are introduced for comparison. The difference degree amplitudes in terms of geoid height of our HUST-Grace2016s relative to GOCO05c are smaller than 1mm and 1cm before degree 100 and degree 138, respectively. In terms of global gravity anomalies and geoid heights relative to GOCO05c, the RMS values of our model up to degree 140 are 4.31cm and 0.87mGal respectively, which are smaller compared to AIUB-GRACE03S, GGM05S and Tongji-GRACE01. In addition, validated with GPS-leveling data in North America and the Netherlands, the standard deviation values of our HUST-Grace2016s model are 46.56cm and 24.80cm respectively, which also performs better than AIUB-GRACE03S, GGM05S and Tongji-GRACE01.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.