Abstract

Summary The removal of individuals through hunting can destabilize social structure, potentially affecting population dynamics. Although previous studies have shown that hunting can indirectly reduce juvenile survival through increased sexually selected infanticide (SSI), very little is known about the spatiotemporal effects of male hunting on juvenile survival.Using detailed individual monitoring of a hunted population of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Sweden (1991–2011), we assessed the spatiotemporal effect of male removal on cub survival.We modelled cub survival before, during and after the mating season. We used three proxies to evaluate spatial and temporal variation in male turnover; distance and timing of the closest male killed and number of males that died around a female's home range centre.Male removal decreased cub survival only during the mating season, as expected in seasonal breeders with SSI. Cub survival increased with distance to the closest male killed within the previous 1·5 years, and it was lower when the closest male killed was removed 1·5 instead of 0·5 year earlier. We did not detect an effect of the number of males killed.Our results support the hypothesis that social restructuring due to hunting can reduce recruitment and suggest that the distribution of the male deaths might be more important than the overall number of males that die. As the removal of individuals through hunting is typically not homogenously distributed across the landscape, spatial heterogeneity in hunting pressure may cause source–sink dynamics, with lower recruitment in areas of high human‐induced mortality.

Highlights

  • Human exploitation affects wild vertebrates globally (Milner, Nilsen & Andreassen 2007; Allendorf & Hard 2009) and is considered one of the greatest evolutionary pressures on wildlife (Darimont et al 2009)

  • Using detailed individual monitoring of a hunted population of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Sweden (1991–2011), we assessed the spatiotemporal effect of male removal on cub survival

  • We modelled cub survival before, during and after the mating season

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human exploitation affects wild vertebrates globally (Milner, Nilsen & Andreassen 2007; Allendorf & Hard 2009) and is considered one of the greatest evolutionary pressures on wildlife (Darimont et al 2009). Large vertebrates are typically harvested for sport hunting, subsistence, or population management (Festa-Bianchet 2003). It has been suggested that males assess their paternity through mating history and tend not to kill dependent young (hereafter referred to as juveniles) of females they have mated with (Soltis et al 2000). Males encountering unfamiliar females with juveniles (hereafter referred to as male turnover) will have a higher probability of perpetrating infanticide. Male turnover has been shown to increase SSI (Swenson et al 1997; Agrell, Wolff & Ylo€nen 1998; Andreassen & Gundersen 2006), potentially exacerbating the effects of hunting on population dynamics by increasing juvenile mortality after an adult male has been killed (Wielgus et al 2013; Gosselin et al 2015)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call