Abstract

Ernest Hemingway's attitude toward hunting is often understood as having become gentler in later life, though in complex ways that are difficult to sort out. For instance, should we call his approach ethical when he generally stops killing animals for trophies but continues to kill them for meat? And how do these changes reflect upon Hemingway's broader ethical orientation? This essay approaches this problem by revising what we mean by "ethics." Rather than taking ethics simply as established law, I rely on recent ethical theory to present an account of Hemingway's ethics as centered on openness to experience and to aesthetics, driven by cognizance of mortality, and intensified in confrontations with animals.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.