Abstract
Abstract The potential impact of domestic cats on wildlife is the subject of growing international interest and concern. While feral cats are often the primary focus of research and debate, in many societies a substantial proportion of domestic cats are owned by private individuals. We present a typology that classifies domestic cats in relation to varying degrees of human control over their reproduction, movement, and provisioning. Understanding the perceptions and practices of cat owners will be key to identifying and mitigating any negative ecological effects of cat hunting behaviour. To investigate how cat owners perceive (a) their pets’ hunting behaviour, (b) their responsibilities for managing this, and (c) the mitigation strategies available, we conducted detailed interviews with a diverse sample of cat owners in the United Kingdom. We identified a spectrum of views on hunting behaviour, from owners who perceived hunting as positive (for pest control, or as healthy cat behaviour) to those who were deeply concerned about its consequences for wild animals, their populations, and welfare. However, hunting was widely understood as a normal, natural component of cat behaviour, and owners rarely perceived a strong individual responsibility for preventing or reducing it. Those who did wish to manage hunting perceived several barriers to this, including concern that they were unable to control behaviour effectively without compromising cat welfare, doubt about the efficacy and practicality of popular mitigation measures, and unfamiliarity with alternative options. We recommend that (a) initiatives directed at changing cat owners’ behaviour consider the multiple factors and competing priorities that inform their decision‐making (particularly cat health and welfare and practicality or cost of interventions); (b) researchers work collaboratively with cat owners and veterinary, cat welfare, and conservation organizations to identify effective solutions, and (c) some degree of accountability for managing problematic hunting behaviour should be promoted as a part of “responsible pet ownership” initiatives. A plain language summary is available for this article.
Highlights
Managing the effects of domestic cats (Felis catus) on wildlife is an international challenge in conservation science, policy, and practice
We identified a spectrum of views on hunting behaviour, from owners who per‐ ceived hunting as positive to those who were deeply concerned about its consequences for wild animals, their popu‐ lations, and welfare
We have identified a series of key issues and challenges that should be taken into account in continuing discussions about cat ownership, husbandry, and management
Summary
Managing the effects of domestic cats (Felis catus) on wildlife is an international challenge in conservation science, policy, and practice. Efforts to avoid or mitigate any impacts of owned cats on wildlife will require cat owners to (a) iden‐ tify cat hunting behaviour as a problematic activity, (b) take or ac‐ cept responsibility for managing that behaviour, and (c) be equipped with the appropriate incentives, knowledge, and capacity to do so effectively. We are interested in whether, and to what ex‐ tent, cat owners consider hunting behaviour problematic; whether they consider themselves responsible for their pets’ hunting; and if so, what methods they employ, or might employ, to mitigate this. To explore these issues, we conducted detailed, semi‐structured inter‐ views with cat owners in the United Kingdom. We have identified a series of key issues and challenges that should be taken into account in continuing discussions about cat ownership, husbandry, and management
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
