Abstract

I construct a tractable structural model of a poor household's demand for cheap dietary staples. This model characterizes the trade-offs that a poor household faces between satiating hunger and satisfying other needs when it spends its scarce resources on food. I use this model to extrapolate the equivalent variation, the willingness to pay, and the dead-weight loss of Jensen and Miller's (2008) price subsidy experiment on cheap dietary staples among the extreme poor (figure 1), and I also use it to extrapolate Pareto improving policies relative to their subsidy treatment (figure 5).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.