Abstract

Sense of humor is a multidimensional personality construct. Some components may be more relevant to psychological health than others. While there has been a considerable amount of research on humor styles, humor creation ability (HCA) has remained relatively understudied in relation to well-being. This study employed two methods of assessing HCA (a cartoon captioning task and a task involving the generation of humorous responses to vignettes depicting everyday frustrating situations) to study associations with mental health variables. In addition to these humor creation performance tasks, 215 participants completed measures of four humor styles (Humor Styles Questionnaire) and psychological well-being (self-esteem, satisfaction with life, optimism, depression, anxiety, and stress). No significant correlations were found between either of the HCA tasks and any of the well-being measures. In contrast, humor styles were significantly correlated with well-being variables in ways consistent with previous research. In addition, the frustrating situation humor creation task was positively correlated with all four humor styles. These findings add support to the view that the ability to create humor is less relevant to mental health than are the ways people use humor in their daily lives. Implications for humor-based interventions are discussed.

Highlights

  • Sense of humor is a multidimensional personality construct

  • humor creation ability (HCA) w as measured using tw o performance tasks to explore the possibility that the ability to generate humorous comments in response to ev eryday frustrating situations is more strongly correlated w ith mental health v ariables than is the ability to create funny captions for cartoons

  • The results indicated that neither the Cartoon Caption Task (CCT) nor the Frustrating Situation Humor Creation Task (FSHCT) w as significantly correlated w ith any of the psychological health measures, suggesting that the ability to create humor is not associated w ith w ell-being

Read more

Summary

Met hod Participants

The sample w as comprised of 215 first-year undergraduate students (92 males, 123 females) enrolled in an I ntroductory Psychology course at the Univ ersity of Western Ontario. I nter-rater reliability (internal consistency) w as calculated using the ratings of each of the six raters, av eraging across all the responses of each participant, as equiv alent to six items on a scale. The LOT-R assesses indiv idual differences in optimism This self-report scale consists of six statements plus four filler items. Respondents indicate the degree to w hich each statement is consistent w ith their ow n feelings on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). Participants rate statements describing general feelings of self -w orth and self-acceptance on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree). Participants rate each statement using a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).

Procedure
Resu lt s
Mental Health Variables
HSQ SE
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call