Abstract

Acute proximal humeral fractures in the elderly are generally treated non-operatively if alignment is acceptable and in stable fracture patterns. When operative treatment is indicated, surgical fixation is often difficult or impossible to obtain. Hemiarthroplasty has long been the standard of care. However, with its reliance on tuberosity healing, functional outcomes and patient satisfaction are often poor. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has emerged as a new technology for treating proximal humeral fractures but the indications for its use remain uncertain. While not conclusive, the evidence suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty yields more consistent results, with improved forward elevation and higher functional outcome scores. The primary advantages of hemiarthroplasty are improved shoulder rotation and shorter operative time. Complication rates do not vary significantly between the two options. Although higher quality trials are needed to further define the role of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, current evidence suggests that this is a reasonable option for surgeons who are highly familiar with its use.

Highlights

  • Acute fractures of the proximal humerus are the third most common type of fracture in the elderly [1]

  • Non-union or malunion of the tuberosities have been associated with poor results with hemiarthroplasty; complete healing does appear to be necessary for a successful outcome following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) [4]

  • Functional outcome measures and Range of motion (ROM) were significantly higher in patients with healed tuberosities, these scores were lower than in patients treated with RSA regardless of tuberosity healing [14]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Acute fractures of the proximal humerus are the third most common type of fracture in the elderly [1]. Depending on patient and fracture characteristics, these can often be effectively treated non-operatively, as is the case in 80-85% of patients [2]. Options include shoulder arthroplasty, or reconstructive options including fixation with proximal humeral locked plate constructs in the physiologically young with adequate bone stock [3]. Humeral head replacement arthroplasty (HHR) has historically been the treatment of choice for proximal humeral fractures as advocated initially by Neer [2]. In recent years there has been a trend towards reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This has occurred in part due to the prevalence of rotator cuff deficiency in the affected patient population. RSA may allow for a shorter period of immobilization post-operatively given its semi-constrained design

Epidemiology
CLINICAL DECISION MAKING
OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES
HUMERAL HEAD REPLACEMENT – CLINICAL OUTCOMES
Conclusion
27 RSA pt
11 RSA 12 HHR
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call