Abstract

The present article focuses on explaining F. Rahman’s humanist and historical approach to the Quran. Pakistani thinker criticizes the concept of Quran as “uncreated” as it was established in the Islamic world after the rejection of Mu‘tazila. He states that in this view Quran is separated from the actual history and lives of people and thus cannot become the spiritual guidance it is supposed to be. The author demonstrates that F. Rahman continues the Neomodernist tendency in Islam and creatively employs the ideas of his predecessors. In particular, he does not argue with the revelationist idea of the Quran, but he urges to analyze it in context of historical revelation and consider the situational nature of particular physical articulation of ayahs performed by the Prophet. Author also notes that in order to perform a novel interpretation of Quran F. Rahman has to rethink the traditionalist legalistic ordinances for believers as they are set to regulate life only externally. Rahman also criticizes atomistic method, which implies separation of the Quran and its meaning from all the other Quranic ideas, and strives for holistic method in hermeneutics of Quran. Historical critique applied to the Quran by F. Rahman serves to understand it in its historicity, and in doing so clarifies the embodiment of universal ethical concepts in particular instances.

Highlights

  • The present article focuses on explaining F. Rahman's

  • Pakistani thinker criticizes the concept of Quran

  • as it was established in the Islamic world after the rejection

Read more

Summary

Introduction

В частности, Рахман не отрицает богооткровенности Корана, но предлагает рассматривать его в контексте исторического события откровения и учитывать ситуационность конкретной физико-акустической артикуляции айатов Пророком. Историко-критический метод Рахмана, резюмируемый в данной статье, служит пониманию Корана в аспекте его историчности в связи с идеей о воплощении универсальных этических концептов в частном. Изучение концепции Рахмана как в некотором смысле парадигматической для совокупности несводимых друг к другу версий неомодернистского дискурса позволяет высоко оценить их успех в утверждении нового подхода к соотношению традиции и современности.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.