Abstract

The use of robots in the national economy—especially in industrialized countries—is growing. At the same time, the interdependency between humans and robots is getting increasingly closer: they are engaging in direct contact with each other as more and more organizations let robots and humans work hand-in-hand. One factor that predicts successful human–robot interdependency is the acceptance of the robot by the human. Generally, only when an innovative assistive working system covers human needs and expectations, it is perceived to be useful and hence accepted. Furthermore, it has been found that cultural context has an impact on human–robot interaction, as people feel more comfortable interacting with a robot in a culturally normative way. Therefore this paper aims at presenting a human–robot collaboration acceptance model (HRCAM) with regard to the collaboration between humans and robots that is based on prior acceptance models, while also considering technology affinity and ethical, legal and social implications. Additionally, similarities and differences in robot acceptance are shown for four selected countries—both in comparison to the overall human–robot collaboration acceptance model and between the countries. The HRCAM additionally shows which variables influence perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, and thus behavioral intention to use and use behavior. A further distinction is made between anchor variables, which can be influenced in the long term, and adjustment variables, which can be influenced in the short to medium term. The model therefore offers practitioners in the field of human–robot collaboration recommendations to increase the acceptance of robots.

Highlights

  • Since the middle of the 20th century, robots have become a vital part of today’s production industry [1, 2]

  • According to IFR estimates, there are 314 robots per 10,000 working persons in the national economy of Japan, followed by the Federal Republic of Germany (292 robots per 10,000 working persons), the United States of America (164 robots per 10,000 working persons) and the People’s Republic of China (36 robots per 10,000 working persons)

  • It should be noted that the correlation coefficients for both active and passive robot types are large for the variable subjective norm, job relevance, perception of external control, perceived safety and occupational safety

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the middle of the 20th century, robots have become a vital part of today’s production industry [1, 2]. According to IFR estimates, there are 314 robots per 10,000 working persons in the national economy of Japan, followed by the Federal Republic of Germany (hereinafter abbreviated as Germany) (292 robots per 10,000 working persons), the United States of America (hereinafter abbreviated as USA) (164 robots per 10,000 working persons) and the People’s Republic of China (hereafter abbreviated as China) (36 robots per 10,000 working persons) These countries have the biggest industrial robot sales. Robots are no longer only used in large corporations, but due to simpler programming and lower costs more and more SMEs will introduce robots in the few years, which will further increase sales While most of these robots do not share a workspace with human workers, it stands to reason that a similar trend of propagation will likely be observed for collaborative robots, as the required technologies become increasingly cheaper and more robust. Subjective norm, image, job relevance, output quality, result demonstrability, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, behavioral intention, use behavior

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call