Abstract

Once considered the internal domain of states, of late human rights issues and concerns have been frequently raised at the international level through the use of human rights diplomacy. However, human rights diplomacy is not only confined to like-minded states who often raise issues pertaining to human rights violations abroad, but can also employed by states violating human rights as a means for its own defence. Under intense criticism for its abysmal human rights record, the Myanmar regime too has often resorted to human rights diplomacy as a strategy to deflect criticism, mainly from without. In doing so, the regime not only often invokes the notion of sovereignty, but even undertakes systematic attacks on the members of the international media and transnational advocacy groups who raise these issues. In addition and knowing that these issues have often dented its own credibility and legitimacy, the Myanmar junta even embarked on an image-building campaign, namely by enlisting the services of foreign public relations firms. In the light of these developments, this article will analyse how Myanmar’s military regime has used defensive human rights diplomacy to ward-off criticism against its poor human rights record.

Highlights

  • The creation of the global normative architecture by the United Nations that began with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) on December 1948, and which eventually evolved into what is informally known as the International Bill of Human Rights meant that human rights issues and concerns had arrived on the international stage

  • The target state would deny that such human rights violations even occurred in the first place

  • A target state may not just refute these charges but even concoct it own version of what constitutes human rights and frequently use the notion of sovereignty to argue that all these allegations constitute an interference in the affairs of a sovereign state

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The creation of the global normative architecture by the United Nations that began with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) on December 1948, and which eventually evolved into what is informally known as the International Bill of Human Rights meant that human rights issues and concerns had arrived on the international stage. In the aftermath of the 1988 demonstrations and the subsequent nullifying of the 1990 election results, the junta went on a defensive mode by denying all allegations of human rights violations and frequently invoking the issue of sovereignty and nationalism The focus of this effort has specially targeted the domestic opposition (mainly the National League for Democracy/NLD), like-minded Western states, transnational advocacy groups and the international media. Apart from denying charges of human rights violations, the Myanmar junta has frequently the Military Junta’s Defensive Human Rights Diplomacy posited itself as an institution that promotes development in the country and working enduringly to eradicate the drug trade In other words, it has frequently used the notion of development as well as performance legitimacy whenever certain states have raised the issue of its legitimacy in spite of the 1990 elections that gave a clear landslide victory to the NLD. In 2002, it was reported that the Myanmar junta had employed a United States lobbying firm, DCI Associates, for US$450,000 a year, to help improve its international image and relations with the United States.[53]

Conclusion
25 Report Card Burma
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.