Abstract

This paper explores the interplay between the human rights and drug control frameworks and critiques case law on medicinal cannabis use to demonstrate that a bona fide human rights perspective allows for a broader conception of ‘health’. This broad conception, encompassing both medicalised and social constructionist definitions, can inform public health policies relating to medicinal cannabis use. The paper also demonstrates how a human rights lens can alleviate a core tension between the State and the individual within the drug policy field. The leading medicinal cannabis case in the UK highlights the judiciary’s failure to engage with an individual’s human right to health as they adopt an arbitrary, externalist view, focussing on the legality of cannabis to the exclusion of other concerns. Drawing on some international comparisons, the paper considers how a human rights perspective can lead to an approach to medicinal cannabis use which facilitates a holistic understanding of public health.

Highlights

  • Attempts to reconcile human rights and public health frameworks highlight ‘embedded tensions between the individual and the collective’, since human rights regimes are individualistic, as opposed to centring upon whole populations (Labonté, 2008, p. 478)

  • This paper explores the interplay between the human rights and drug control frameworks and critiques case law on medicinal cannabis use to demonstrate that a bona fide human rights perspective allows for a broader conception of ‘health’

  • It will demonstrate how a human rights lens can better inform public health policies relating to medicinal cannabis use and psychoactive substance use more generally

Read more

Summary

Critical Public Health

Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ccph. Public health and medicinal cannabis use Melissa Bonea & Toby Seddona a School of Law, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK Published online: 28 Apr 2015

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Introduction
Conclusion
Cases cited
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.