Abstract

The Molla Sali case, recently heard by the ECtHR, concerns the compatibility of the implementation of Sharia in the family and personal relations of the Muslims of Western Thrace, who remained within the boundaries of the Greek State after the exchange of populations under the Treaty of Lausanne, to the ECHR. The applicant, a Greek national of the Muslim minority of Western Thrace, complained that she could not be beneficiary by testament of her deceased husband’s estate, member of the same minority, since, according to the position of the Court of Cassation, due to a series of international agreements and relevant domestic norms, the law of succession applicable to her case was the Islamic Law that prohibits the testament, instead of the civil law. However, the ECtHR found that the applicant was victim of a violation of article 14 of the ECHR in conjunction with article 1 of Protocol no 1. In this case, the ECtHR considered for the first time the question of the compatibility of a religious community’s separate legal status with the ECHR. The rationale behind the decision is within the framework of the core principles of the Court’s case law on the limits of the autonomy of religious communities and acknowledgement of minority rights. The Court, based on the main line of arguments which constitute the corpus of its jurisprudence on religious and minority issues, ruled that the separate legal status of the Muslim minority cannot justify divergences from the application of the General Law, to the extent that such divergences violate the Greek citizens’ rights enshrined in the Constitution and the ECHR and it condemned Greece on the basis of “discrimination by association”.

Highlights

  • On 19 December 2018, the ECtHR delivered its much-awaited judgment on the case of Molla Sali v

  • Molla Sali concerns the compatibility of the implementation of the Sharia in the family and personal relations of the Muslims of Western Thrace, who remained within the boundaries of the Greek state after the exchange of populations under the Treaty of Lausanne, to the Convention

  • Concluding Remarks In Molla Sali, the ECtHR considered for the first time the question of the compatibility of a religious community’s separate legal status with the Convention

Read more

Summary

Introduction

On 19 December 2018, the ECtHR delivered its much-awaited judgment on the case of Molla Sali v. Molla Sali concerns the compatibility of the implementation of the Sharia in the family and personal relations of the Muslims of Western Thrace, who remained within the boundaries of the Greek state after the exchange of populations under the Treaty of Lausanne, to the Convention. Regarding any potential conflict between international obligations and the protection of rights, the Supreme Court, even indirectly, prioritizes among them as it considers that the implementation of the Sharia in specific fields (must be compatible but eventually) is not contrary to the Constitution and the Convention.3 This judgment of the Supreme Court is based on an underlying assumption across the rationale of all relevant decisions, namely that the state assumes the role of guarantor of the identity of minority members.. It should be noted that the Molla Sali case is the first case in which the ECtHR deals with the compatibility with the Convention of a legal status for the protection of a minority, which acknowledges exceptions based on religion as to the general rules applicable to the total population of a country.

Religious Communities as Right-Holders According to the Case Law of the ECtHR
Minority Rights versus Individual Rights
Article 1 of the 1rst Protocol to the Convention
Article 14 of the Convention
Concluding Remarks

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.