Abstract

Faithful DNA replication is essential for genome stability. To ensure accurate replication, numerous complex and redundant replication and repair mechanisms function in tandem with the core replication proteins to ensure DNA replication continues even when replication challenges are present that could impede progression of the replication fork. A unique topological challenge to the replication machinery is posed by RNA-DNA hybrids, commonly referred to as R-loops. Although R-loops play important roles in gene expression and recombination at immunoglobulin sites, their persistence is thought to interfere with DNA replication by slowing or impeding replication fork progression. Therefore, it is of interest to identify DNA-associated enzymes that help resolve replication-impeding R-loops. Here, using DNA fiber analysis, we demonstrate that human ribonuclease H1 (RNH1) plays an important role in replication fork movement in the mammalian nucleus by resolving R-loops. We found that RNH1 depletion results in accumulation of RNA-DNA hybrids, slowing of replication forks, and increased DNA damage. Our data uncovered a role for RNH1 in global DNA replication in the mammalian nucleus. Because accumulation of RNA-DNA hybrids is linked to various human cancers and neurodegenerative disorders, our study raises the possibility that replication fork progression might be impeded, adding to increased genomic instability and contributing to disease.

Highlights

  • Faithful DNA replication is essential for genome stability

  • Because R-loops form throughout the genome and ribonuclease H1 (RNH1) can resolve R-loops that would pose barriers to the replication machinery, we hypothesized that RNH1 might play an important role in the nucleus and that its loss might perturb replication fork progression and elicit a DNA damage response [4]

  • These data suggest that RNH1 assists the replication machinery by resolving RNA–DNA hybrids that could present a topological barrier to replication fork progression

Read more

Summary

ARTICLE cro

Received for publication, March 21, 2017, and in revised form, June 21, 2017 Published, Papers in Press, July 17, 2017, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M117.787473 Shankar Parajuli‡, Daniel C. Teasley‡, Bhavna Murali‡, Jessica Jackson§, Alessandro Vindigni§¶1, and Sheila A. Stewart‡¶ʈ**2 From the Departments of ‡Cell Biology and Physiology and ʈMedicine, ¶Siteman Cancer Center, and **Integrating Communications within the Cancer Environment (ICCE) Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 and the §Edward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63104

Edited by Patrick Sung
Results
Discussion
Cell culture
Western blot analysis
Metaphase chromosome preparation
Fluorescence imaging
Genomic quantitative PCR
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call