Abstract
In response to the Dougherty thesis that contemporary human reliability analysis (HRA) methods are inadequate, this paper proposes that credible assessments of these HRA methods adequacy can be obtained only by means of their full exploitation by human factors specialists as part of the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) process. The paper traces the history of human factors in PRA. It concludes that regarding PRA, only peripheral attention has been given to human factors; further that there has been almost a total absence of human factors specialists involved in the PRA process. The paper introduces and discusses a recent US Nuclear Regulatory Commission research initiative on a task analysis-linked evaluation technique (TALENT) concept for integrating human factors expertise into the PRA process, and fully exploiting state-of-knowledge HRA methods and data. The paper concludes that by means of TALENT implementation: (1) more credible assessments of HRA methods adequacy can be made, and (2) more realistic estimates of the overall impact of human error on complex high reliability systems' reliability and risk can be achieved.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
