Abstract

We hardly notice our eye blinks, yet an externally generated retinal interruption of a similar duration is perceptually salient. We examined the neural correlates of this perceptual distinction using intracranially measured ECoG signals from the human visual cortex in 14 patients. In early visual areas (V1 and V2), the disappearance of the stimulus due to either invisible blinks or salient blank video frames ('gaps') led to a similar drop in activity level, followed by a positive overshoot beyond baseline, triggered by stimulus reappearance. Ascending the visual hierarchy, the reappearance-related overshoot gradually subsided for blinks but not for gaps. By contrast, the disappearance-related drop did not follow the perceptual distinction - it was actually slightly more pronounced for blinks than for gaps. These findings suggest that blinks' limited visibility compared with gaps is correlated with suppression of blink-related visual activity transients, rather than with "filling-in" of the occluded content during blinks.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe perceived continuity of the visual input despite its frequent interruptions by spontaneous eye blinks is a ubiquitous and powerful dissociation between sensation and perception

  • Fourteen patients undergoing electrocorticographic evaluation for intractable epilepsy participated in the study

  • Due to technical limitations imposed by the clinical setting, the gaps employed in the current study were only an approximate simulation of the retinal impact of eye blinks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The perceived continuity of the visual input despite its frequent interruptions by spontaneous eye blinks is a ubiquitous and powerful dissociation between sensation and perception. The perceptual omission of one’s own eye blinks cannot be explained by the blinks’ apparent briefness: blinks occlude the pupil for a considerable amount of time, typically 100–150 ms (Riggs et al, 1981). External darkenings of such duration have been shown to cause a robust percept (Riggs et al, 1981). Since blinks normally occur at least 1000 times an hour (Cruz et al, 2011), about three or four percent of our waking hours are unknowingly spent with our

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.