Abstract
Improvements in safety in the air and in space can be achieved through better ergonomics, better work environment, and other efforts of the traditional avionic psychology that directly affect human behaviors and performance. There is also a significant potential, however, for further reduction in aerospace accidents and casualties through better understanding the role that various uncertainties play in the planner’s and operator’s worlds of work, when never-perfect human, never failure-free navigation equipment and instrumentation, never hundred-percent-predictable response of the object of control (air- or space-craft), and uncertain-and-often-harsh environments contribute jointly to the likelihood of a mishap. By employing quantifiable and measurable ways of assessing the role and significance of such uncertainties and treating a human-in-the-loop (HITL) as a part, often the most crucial part, of a complex man–instrumentation–equipment–vehicle–environment system, one could improve dramatically the state-of-the-art in assuring aerospace operational safety. This can be done by predicting, quantifying and, if necessary, even specifying an adequate (low enough) probability of a possible accident. Nothing and nobody is perfect, of course, and the difference between a highly reliable object, product, performance or a mission and an insufficiently reliable one is “merely” in the level of the never-zero probability of failure. Application of the probabilistic predictive modeling (PPM) concept provides a natural and an effective means for reduction of vehicular casualties. When success and safety are imperative, ability to predict and quantify the outcome of an HITL related mission or a situation is a must. This is not the current practice though. The application of the PPM concept can improve therefore the state-of-the-art in understanding and accounting for the human performance in a vehicular mission or a situation. While the traditional statistical human-factor-oriented approaches are based on experimentations followed by statistical analyses, the PPM concept is based on, and starts with, physically meaningful and flexible predictive modeling followed by highly focused and highly cost effective experimentations geared to the chosen governing model(s). The PPT concept enables one to quantify, on the probabilistic basis, the outcome of a particular HITL related effort, situation or a mission. If the predicted outcome, in terms of the most likely probability of the operational failure, is not favorable, then an appropriate sensitivity analysis (SA) based on the developed and available algorithms can be effectively conducted to improve the situation. With the appropriate modifications and generalizations, such a cost-effective and insightful approach is applicable to numerous, not even necessarily in the aerospace and vehicular domain, HITL related missions and situations, when a human encounters an uncertain environment or a hazardous off-normal situation. The suggested approach is applicable also when there is an incentive to quantify human’s qualifications and performance, and/or when there is a need to assess and possibly improve his/her role in a particular mission or a situation. The general PPM concepts are illustrated in this analysis by addressing several more or less typical aerospace HITL related problems and by providing meaningful numerical examples.
Highlights
Improvements in safety in the air and in space can be achieved through better ergonomics, better work environment, and other efforts of the traditional avionic psychology that directly affect human behaviors and performance
While the traditional statistical human-factor-oriented approaches are based on experimentations followed by statistical analyses, the probabilistic predictive modeling (PPM) concept is based on, and starts with, physically meaningful and flexible predictive modeling followed by highly focused and highly cost effective experimentations geared to the chosen governing model(s)
While considerable improvements in various vehicular technologies and practices can be achieved through better ergonomics, better work environment, and other means that directly affect human behavior, there is an opportunity for reduction in vehicular casualties through the application of the probabilistic predictive modeling (PPM)
Summary
“A pinch of probability is worth a pound of perhaps.”—James G. The MWL vs HCF based PPM models and their modifications and generalizations can be helpful, after appropriate algorithms are developed and extensive SA are carried out, to evaluate the role that the human plays, in terms of his/her ability (capacity) to cope with a MWL in various situations, when human factor, equipment/instrumentation performance and uncertain and often harsh environments contribute jointly to the success and safety of a task or a mission These models can be used to assess the risk of a particular mission success and safety, with consideration of the HITL performance; to develop guidelines for personnel selection and training; to choose the appropriate simulation conditions; and/or to decide if the existing levels of automation and the employed equipment (instrumentation) are adequate in possible off-normal situations (if not, additional and/or more advanced and perhaps more expensive equipment or instrumentation should be developed, tested and installed). (10) consistent, comprehensive and psychologically meaningful PPM plus FOAT assessments can lead to the most feasible HITL qualification (certification) methodologies, practices and specifications
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
