Abstract

AbstractAimIdentifying the variables that influence animal home range size is important for understanding the biological requirements of individuals and their social interactions. Given their often broad distributions, carnivores are model organisms for studying range‐wide determinants of home range size. Here, we test predictions about environmental determinants of home range size for one of the world's most widely distributed carnivores, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes).LocationGlobal.MethodsWe compiled a database of 70 mean home range estimates from 62 studies and four continents, which we analysed according to site‐based temperature, precipitation, environmental productivity and human influence variables.ResultsWe found a very strong negative effect of the Human Footprint Index (HFI), with fox home range size decreasing as the level of human impact increased. When analysing the constituent components of the HFI separately, we found that human population density was the only well‐supported variable (cf. built environments, croplands, pasture lands, nightlights, railways, roads and navigable waterways). Predicted home range size at the highest human population densities (0.75 km2) was 93% lower than at the lowest population densities (10.83 km2). We also found that home range size increased as mean annual temperature and temperature seasonality increased. The analyses did not support our prediction that home ranges would be smaller in areas of higher environmental productivity or precipitation.Main conclusionsSmaller home range sizes observed in highly disturbed areas can be attributed to increased food availability from anthropogenic sources. The lack of an effect of environmental productivity contrasts with previous studies that have shown a negative relationship with carnivore home range size. It may be that anthropogenic food sources have negated the impacts that low‐productivity environments have on fox home ranges. Our results emphasize the strong potential for human activities to transform animal space use across the globe.

Highlights

  • The home range is a fundamental concept relating to the ecological requirements of animals and their interactions with conspecifics, competitors and predators (Börger, Dalziel, & Fryxell, 2008; Powell & Mitchell, 2012)

  • We found a very strong negative effect of the Human Footprint Index (HFI), with fox home range size decreasing as the level of human impact increased

  • When analysing the constituent components of the HFI separately, we found that human population density was the only well-supported variable

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The home range is a fundamental concept relating to the ecological requirements of animals and their interactions with conspecifics, competitors and predators (Börger, Dalziel, & Fryxell, 2008; Powell & Mitchell, 2012). Because it is linked to many other important concepts, including optimal foraging theory and bioenergetics (Börger et al, 2008; Johnson, Kays, Blackwell, & Macdonald, 2002), home ranges can be used to assess and predict how natural or anthropogenic disturbances affect the behaviour and spatial distribution of animals. This is important in our current era of global change as humans increasingly transform ecosystems and alter species assemblages. The drivers and consequences of these altered movement patterns include changes in resource availability, restricted gene flow, novel species interactions and human–wildlife conflict (Cosgrove, McWhorter, & Maron, 2018; Newsome et al, 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call