Abstract
Wittgenstein in the Blue Books speaks of our craving for generality in connection with our tendency to look for something in common to all the entities which we assume under a general word or term. According to him, misconceptions arise when we tend to look for something ‘common’ to all the entities which we then associate with a general term indicating quality or property. Taking note of this insight of Wittgenstein, we note that our propensity for generalization is what buttresses the mode of inference in the human evolution theory. Clearly, the theory uses concepts anchored on a constellation of terminology belonging to Wittgenstein’s notion of “language games,” i.e. “family resemblances,” “form of life,” “move,” and “grammar.” Complex taxonomic systems (phylogenic trees) have been constructed founded on a linguistic-conceptual hybrid, i.e. the term ‘family resemblance’ mixed with the term ‘common ancestry.’ With phylogeny as (false) ‘evidence’ of common ancestry, action was then propelled by the words ‘family resemblance’ in the sense in which ‘objects,’ e.g. fossil skulls found in geological sites dated millions of years old, resemble ‘modern’ skulls. The biological concept of ‘forms of life’ can be pitted against Wittgenstein's "form of life" concept. The latter is the cultural environment in which the language game occurs, and is applicable to the "community which is bound together by science and education" (Wittgenstein, 1969, p. 38e). Insofar can we consider this ‘community bound together’ as a fertile ground for the culture of semiotic practices. The existing ‘scientific’ theories of the origin of man are the outcome of a reality built by the action motivated or boosted by the notional use of words. The ‘language’ of phylogeny, on closer analysis, is really simply a categorization based on ‘family resemblance’ in extended application through the use of the words ‘ancestral taxon.’
 References
 Darwin, Charles, 1859. On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray
 James Joyce, 1922. Finnegans Wake. London: Faber and Faber.
 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, In Wittgenstein, Docherty, 1991. The Blue and Brown Books : Preliminary Studies for the ‘Philosophical Investigation,’ Philosophy 8 Jan 1991
 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1921. Tractatus Philosophicus-Logicus. Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung. Tr. Charles Kay Ogden. GB: Lund Humpries
 Online sources:
 https//www2.palomar.edu>homo2
 https:www.researchgate.net
 https:en.m. Wikipedia.org/wi
 www.signosemio.com/wittge
 https: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree of life (biology)
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_of_life_biology; retrieved 11 August 2018
 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maoyan_Zhu
 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2407115
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Scientia - The International Journal on the Liberal Arts
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
