Abstract

BackgroundSerum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a potential marker for endometrial cancer (EC), however, the diagnostic value of HE4 for EC remains controversial. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of serum HE4 for EC. MethodsLiterature reports of the diagnostic accuracy of serum HE4 for EC were systematically identified using online data-bases. The meta-analysis was performed using STATA 12.0, Meta-Disc 1.4, and Review Manager 5.2. ResultsA total of 4182 participants and 23 studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56–0.73), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84–0.95), (95% CI: 4.38–12.64), 0.38 (95% CI: 0.31–0.47), 19.46 (95% CI: 11.61–32.62) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81 to 0.87), respectively. Our overall analysis suggested that HE4 is a useful diagnostic marker for EC. Subgroup analysis indicated that studies with benign disease controls showed higher diagnostic accuracies than those with healthy controls. ConclusionSerum HE4 may serve as a potential biomarker for EC diagnosis. Due to certain limitations, this conclusion should to be cautiously interpreted.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call