Human capital in an industrial impasse

Radiy Ibragimov,V Kankhva

doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202125810003

Radiy Ibragimov, V Kankhva

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125810003

Copy DOI

Abstract

Crises, shaking developed economic systems, force us to look for strategic ways of development, alternative to the usual paradigm, in which the main vector of development from a pre-industrial to a post-industrial economy leads to a global model of a consumer society, beyond which there is a social abyss. The latest shock to the global economic system is the COVID-19 pandemic. To overcome this misfortune, authoritative experts propose a series of radical organizational and economic measures, but their goal is old - to preserve consumption as the main economic motive of social behavior. This, in turn, leaves in force the global civilizational risks and preserves the status of a myth for the concept of «sustainable development». The proposed article contains an attempt to substantiate an alternative vision of the model of history, in which it is proposed to consider the pre-industrial type of economy as basic on the basis of such criteria as efficiency, prospects and adequacy of the reproduction of human capital. Finally, sustainable development of a socio-economic system of any scale is possible only if such antagonistic indicators as production efficiency and employment of the population are reconciled. And this is possible only in a pre-industrial type of economy.

Highlights

Russian social sciences have already changed paradigmatic models of history
The empirical part of the presented study is a set of methods used to analyze the problems of generating and effectively using human capital in the South Siberian region
A general hypothesis arose, according to which the pre-industrial type of economy is paradoxically promising for individual socio-territorial entities, and possibly on a universal, global scale. (Human development report. (2014) United Nations Publications, New York)

Summary

Introduction

Russian social sciences have already changed paradigmatic models of history. Marxist theory of socio-economic, in the categories of which scientists were forced to think during the 1920-1980s. disappeared somehow suddenly, like any other scheme, it remained quite applicable within certain limits. [1, P.4] The most widespread argument among experts against the formation model is that it has become out of fashion.Another hobby that has become noticeable and even widespread since the 1980s. civilizational paradigm. Russian social sciences have already changed paradigmatic models of history. [1, P.4] The most widespread argument among experts against the formation model is that it has become out of fashion. Marxist theory of socio-economic, in the categories of which scientists were forced to think during the 1920-1980s. Disappeared somehow suddenly, like any other scheme, it remained quite applicable within certain limits. Another hobby that has become noticeable and even widespread since the 1980s. The direct driver of intellectual fashion was, S.

Methods

Results

Conclusion