Abstract

This study aims at testing the causal relationship between human capital via the government spending share on education and economic growth using cross-country evidence and investigating the relationship pattern between such human capital – growth and the level of economic development based on 30 country data. The study employs a standard approach through uniting root test and Granger causality test. The data is annually collected during the periods 1983 – 2012, totaling to 30 observations. The finding indicates that for both developing and developed countries, education human capital cannot explain much the economic growth and vice versa. In addition, from the relationship pattern between human capital – growth and the economic development level neutrality is the most commonly found pattern for both developing and developed countries. However, we see somewhat difference between them in terms of causation running from growth to human capital. That is, the number of developed countries is almost double as compared to the developing ones. This gives rise to a policy implication for developed countries in that it should put more emphasis on the government education spending share to GDP since it can help boost human capital in the long run.

Highlights

  • Human capability has long been known as indispensable to economic growth

  • To investigate the causal relationships, if there exist, between education human capital and economic growth for both developing and developed countries by using the share spent on education to GDP as proxy for human capital

  • This present study uses time-series econometric models pertaining to unit root test and Granger causality test

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human capability has long been known as indispensable to economic growth. does human capital is a crucial factor of production, but it can lead to positive externalities as well. Schultz (1961) invented the term “human capital” and referred it to the value of human capabilities. He mentioned that human capital is comparable to other types of capital because it could be invested in various ways such as education, training, and health. If one has more education and training or better health, he or she would have more accumulated personal human capital stock. Such investment will cause their productivity higher, raising one’s earnings and higher aggregate level of production. This challenges scholars to find a way to match concepts with empirical evidence

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.