Abstract

Human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) is a substantial improvement upon 20th century attempts at developing an ecological footprint indicator because of its measurability in relation to net primary production, its close relationship to other key footprint measures, such as carbon and water, and its spatial specificity. This paper explores HANPP across four geographical scales: through literature review, the planet; through reanalysis of existing data, variations among the world’s countries; and through novel analyses, U.S. counties and the 30 m pixel scale for one U.S. county. Results show that HANPP informs different sustainability narratives at different scales. At the planetary scale, HANPP is a critical planetary limit that improves upon areal land use indicators. At the country macroscale, HANPP indicates the degree to which meeting the needs of the domestic population for provisioning ecosystem services (food, feed, biofiber, biofuel) presses against the domestic ecological endowment of net primary production. At the county mesoscale, HANPP reveals the dependency of metropolitan areas upon regional specialized rural forestry and agroecosystems to which they are teleconnected through trade and transport infrastructures. At the pixel microscale, HANPP provides the basis for deriving spatial patterns of remaining net primary production upon which biodiversity and regulatory and cultural ecosystem services are dependent. HANPP is thus a sustainability indicator that can fulfill similar needs as carbon, water and other footprints.

Highlights

  • Led by concerns over carbon emissions that drive climate change, footprint accounting has become increasingly sophisticated and scientifically sound, and taken on growing importance in environmental policy

  • We trace the development from initial 20th century popularized versions of ecological footprints to the more sophisticated and precise 21st century concept of Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP)

  • The primary research question addressed is: how does HANPP inform our understanding of environmental sustainability at various geographical scales, from a planet, to a country, to a U.S county, to a pixel?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Led by concerns over carbon emissions that drive climate change, footprint accounting has become increasingly sophisticated and scientifically sound, and taken on growing importance in environmental policy. In the 1990s, Wackernagel and Rees developed the ecological footprint concept as the area of biologically productive land and ocean that is required to continuously provide the resources consumed by a group of people (such as a country), and to process their wastes [5]. According to their analysis, the average human used 6 to 7 acres; since the. A generic, geographically unidentified acre of “biologically productive land” was the currency through which the ecological footprint was measured, yet the biological productivity of ecosystems varies enormously

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call