Human Anatomy as a Part of the Biological Curriculum

Abstract

WE would draw the attention of our readers to the following “minute” from Cambridge, dated Dec. 2:— “The Board of Natural Sciences Studies report that the study of human anatomy in the University is at a disadvantage in consequence of its not occupying a more prominent and definite position in the Natural Sciences Tripos. It is found from experience that medical students who are candidates for the Natural Sciences Tripos relinquish the study of human anatomy until after the examination for the Tripos, and many are therefore deterred from making the attempt to obtain a degree with honours. Further, the more distinct recognition of human anatomy in the examination for the Tripos cannot fail to elevate the character of the teaching and study of it in the University as a branch of science, especially as it is contemplated by the Board that the subject of human anatomy shall include the mechanism of the human body, the comparison of its parts with those of lower animals, its development, &c. In proposing this addition to the subjects of the Natural Sciences Tripos it is not intended to add to the number of subjects with which students are expected to be acquainted; but the subjects represented in the examination are now so numerous and extensive that they have become practically, to a large extent, alternative, and the additional subject would, it is thought, prove attractive to a large number of students. The addition would also help to maintain the connection between the schools of Natural Science and Medicine. The two days allowed for the examination in practical work in the second part of the examination is scarcely sufficient, and as the number of candidates increases, more time will certainly be required. The Board recommends some alterations in and additions to the regulations for the Natural Sciences Tripos, which will accomplish the object it has in view.”