Abstract
The objective of this study is to compare the Naive Bayes algorithm with Innovative Logistic Regression in order to enhance human activity identification for sitting and walking. To predict human activity, Naive Bayes and Innovative Logistic Regression are used with different training and testing splits. From each group, ten sets of samples are selected, yielding a total of twenty samples. About 80% of the data from an independent sample T test were utilized in the Gpower test (g power setup parameters: α = 0.05 and power = 0.80, β = 0.2). Compared to Naive Bayes (90.7210%), Innovative Logistic Regression (95.5680%) has higher accuracy, with a statistical significance value of P = 0.003 (p < 0.05). When compared to Naive Bayes, Innovative Logistic Regression has higher accuracy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
