Abstract

The bicentenary of the birth of Hugh Miller (1802–1856) in Cromarty (in northern Scotland) has enabled a reappraisal of this fine spare-time geologist, in turn stonemason and banker, and eventually Edinburgh newspaper editor. In Cromarty he had the usual advantages and limitations of a local collector far from metropolitan centres. But Miller was different from other collectors: he was author of classic books such as The Old Red Sandstone , making famous the Old Red Sandstone fishes and Jurassic marine fossils of the area around Cromarty. Miller's ironically titled autobiography My Schools and Schoolmasters recommended geology as an improving recreation. His writings are suffused with the thrill of discovery and the wonder and beauty of fossils, inspiring future geologists such as John Muir (1838–1914), pioneer of environmental conservation, and George Jennings Hinde (1839–1918), microfossil researcher. In his often autobiographical writings Miller made geology an integral part of the world as he saw it: he was not ‘just’ a ‘popularizer’, but (as he always wanted) a literary man in the all-encompassing Victorian manner. Geology merged with local history and folklore — all ‘libraries’ of the past. But his writings remain rooted in insightful observation — as scientist and poet — of specimen and scenery, from microscope slide to landscape, and in careful reconstruction, for instance, of fossil animals from fragmentary remains. When Miller dealt with wider issues of God in creation and the truths of geology, he deployed his fossils, as in Footprints of the Creator (1849) which attacked the reheated Lamarckian evolutionism of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation (1844). But, contrary to the common misconception that he was driven to suicide by a conflict between science and religion, Miller simply saw these as different facets of the same truth. Indeed, he notably defended geology against religious literalists. Miller's fossil collection is now mostly in the National Museums of Scotland, Edinburgh, with some specimens in the new Hugh Miller museum, Cromarty, which derives from that founded by his son, also called Hugh (1850–1896), a professional geologist with the Geological Survey. This appraisal reveals further depths to Hugh Miller's appreciation of geological specimens, and to the significance of his surviving collection. Miller's relationship with the material world of objects shows remarkable consistency and an unwillingness to compartmentalize: Miller's fossils exemplify the deep continuity of his world.

Highlights

  • This paper is a revised version of one originally presented at the Hugh Miller Bicentenary Conference, organised by the Cromarty Arts Trust at Cromarty in October 2002 (Borley 2003) and is an invited addition to the papers arising from the joint meeting of the Geological Society of London History of Geology Group and the Geologists’ Association, The Amateur in British Geology, held at The Geological Society, Burlington House, London, 14–15 March, 2002

  • Miller espoused his unique brand of ‘literary geology’ amongst the many kinds of geologist practising the new science (Knell, 2000), from the widely denigrated Biblical literalists and the dilettante gentlemen collectors to the rising professionals to be found in the museum, university and geological survey

  • Miller made a serious study of the fossils of his home area, making his famous discovery of fossil fishes in the Old Red Sandstone at Cromarty in 1830, initially described only briefly in his first book, Scenes and Legends (1835), his account of the folklore and traditional history of Cromarty

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Contrary to the common modern misconception, Miller was no literalist interpreter of the Bible when it came to geology Miller espoused his unique brand of ‘literary geology’ amongst the many kinds of geologist practising the new science (Knell, 2000), from the widely denigrated Biblical literalists and the dilettante gentlemen collectors to the rising professionals to be found in the museum, university and geological survey. His penetrating insight and apt comments still delight the reader today, even on such unpromising themes as failed coal mines (Torrens, 2003), or when he provides the historian with a stylish mot juste, as when considering the relationship of geology and archaeology (Torrens, 1998).

CONSIDERING THE FOSSIL DISCOVERER AND COLLECTOR
THE DEVELOPMENT OF MILLER’S COLLECTING
WHAT MILLER COLLECTED
THE CROMARTY STONEMASON AS FOSSIL COLLECTOR
GEOLOGY BECOMES MORE THAN A COLLECTION
MILLER AND THE POSSESSION OF NATURE
MILLER’S FOSSILS AS HISTORY AND LANDSCAPE
MILLER’S FOSSILS AND THEIR IMPORTANCE
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.