Abstract

Huddling as social thermoregulatory behavior is commonly used by small mammals to reduce heat loss and energy expenditure in the cold. Our study aimed to determine the effect of huddling behavior on energy conservation, thermogenesis, core body temperature (Tb) regulation and body composition in Brandt's voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii). Adult captive-bred female Brandt's voles (n = 124) (~50 g) in 31 cages with 4 individuals each were exposed to cool (23 ± 1°C) and cold (4 ± 1°C) ambient temperatures (Ta) and were allowed to huddle or were physically separated. The cold huddling (Cold-H) groups significantly reduced food intake by 29% and saved digestible energy 156.99 kJ/day compared with cold separated groups (Cold-S); in cool huddling groups (Cool-H) the reduction in food intake was 26% and digestible energy was saved by 105.19 kJ/day in comparison to the separated groups (Cool-S). Resting metabolic rate (RMR) of huddling groups was 35.7 and 37.2% lower than in separated groups at cold and cool Tas, respectively. Maximum non-shivering thermogenesis (NSTmax) of huddling voles was not affected by Ta, but in Cold-S voles it was significantly increased in comparison to Cool-S. Huddling groups decreased wet thermal conductance by 39% compared with separated groups in the cold, but not in the cool Ta. Unexpectedly, huddling voles significantly decreased Tb by 0.25 – 0.50°C at each Ta. Nevertheless, activity of Cold-H voles was higher than in Cold-S voles. Thus, huddling is energetically highly effective because of reduced metabolic rate, thermogenic capacity and relaxed Tb regulation despite the increase of activity. Therefore, Brandt's voles can remain active and maintain their body condition without increased energetic costs during cold exposure. This study highlights the ecological significance of huddling behavior for maintenance of individual fitness at low costs, and thus survival of population during severe winter in small mammals.

Highlights

  • Winter is a stressful period for mammals when the majority ceases reproduction and allocates nutrients and fuel for the maintenance of the organism

  • For huddling groups the passageways were opened in order to provide free movement of voles; passageways were closed for separated groups, but they had possibilities of olfactory, visual and vocal contacts

  • Repeated measure analysis showed that cold groups increased food intake at the second measure and kept it stable [cold separated groups (Cold-S) F(2,10) = 35.024, P < 0.001; cold huddling (Cold-H) F(2,10) = 35.549, P < 0.001], while cool groups did not show any significant changes over time [Cool-S F(2,14) = 1.065, P = 0.371; cool huddling groups (Cool-H) F(2,12) = 2.043, P = 0.172] (Figure 1B)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Winter is a stressful period for mammals when the majority ceases reproduction and allocates nutrients and fuel for the maintenance of the organism. Huddling as an active and close aggregation of animals is used by many endotherms to reduce heat loss and lower energy expenditure and possibly allowing them to reallocate the saved energy to other functions such as growth or reproduction (Gilbert et al, 2010). In cold environments some small homeothermic mammals slightly lowered their core Tb (Chi and Wang, 2011; Nieminen et al, 2013). Whether the activity pattern in huddling animals is affected by longer period of acclimation remains unexplored. Few studies only mentioned that mice living in group developed less brown adipose tissue in the cold (Heldmaier, 1975) or the activity of uncoupling protein 1 was suppressed due to increased housing mice density (HimmsHagen and Villemure, 1992)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call