Abstract

The politicization of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) has manifested itself to different extents across EU Member States. In some countries, conflicting interpretations about the deal were highly visible in public and political debates, while in others there was hardly any awareness. To further understand this phenomenon, trade scholars have to date not yet deepened nor leveraged the insights of the ‘differentiated politicization’ and social movement literature, which both point to coalition formation as an important trigger of politicization processes. This article contributes to our understanding of variation in politicization across EU Member States, by exploring coalition formation dynamics in differentiated politicization processes, in order to identify the factors facilitating successful domestic coalition formation. Through an exploratory case study design, I focus on three countries that exemplify high, middle, and low politicization cases: Germany, Belgium, and Ireland. By relying on the testimonies of campaigners active during the TTIP episode, I identify three elements that facilitated the formation of a diverse domestic coalition, which subsequently played an important role in pushing for a broad-based debate about the implications of TTIP: (i) an expert ‘mesomobilization’ link with a transnational advocacy network, (ii) the prior availability of domestic alliances, and (iii) an inclusive framing approach in order to establish a diverse coalition. The findings also underline the importance of timing in the unfolding of (successful) politicization processes.

Highlights

  • The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) has gone down in memory as the most politicized EU trade negotiation to date

  • That collective attention turned to this particular deal was in part due to the farreaching market-(de)regulating nature of the deal, sparking normative, value-based concerns, instead of purely economic motivations (De Ville & Siles-Brügge, 2017; Laursen & Roederer-Rynning, 2017). This combination of the high ambitions of the negotiators, and the strong politicization that followed in its wake, make TTIP an extreme case that can illuminate new insights for scholars studying the ever-deepening nature of EU trade agreements, or the societal reaction it provokes

  • As the core network working on trade, they took up a coordinating role, and decided early on that this campaign against TTIP should be pan-European from the start (Interview 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) has gone down in memory as the most politicized EU trade negotiation to date. That collective attention turned to this particular deal was in part due to the farreaching market-(de)regulating nature of the deal, sparking normative, value-based concerns, instead of purely economic motivations (De Ville & Siles-Brügge, 2017; Laursen & Roederer-Rynning, 2017) This combination of the high ambitions of the negotiators, and the strong politicization that followed in its wake, make TTIP an extreme case that can illuminate new insights for scholars studying the ever-deepening nature of EU trade agreements, or the societal reaction it provokes. One of its findings is that, given the actor-driven nature of politicization processes, resource mobilization is quintessential to expanding the scope of conflict (see Zürn, 2018) By connecting this concept to social movement and interest group literature, coalition formation comes to the fore as a crucial element: By building alliances, a multitude of useful campaigning resources are pooled/mobilized (expertise, experience, funding, staff, reputation), essential to kick-start a durable mobilization and politicization process (Crespy, 2016; Junk, 2019). The discussion and conclusions summarize the main findings and discuss how these can serve as the basis for further research (Section 5)

The Importance of Coalition Formation in Politicization Processes
Determinants of Successful Coalition Formation
Research Design
Transnational and Supranational Connections
Germany
Ireland
Belgium
Discussion and Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call