Https://uet.edu.al/jus-justicia/articles/adr-and-domestic-courts-in-albania/

Abstract

Practice has shown that the western democratic legal systems have developed several alternative dispute ways for resolving disagreements between the parties other that national courts. The article aims to explore and highlight the differences between peaceful means of conflict resolution and to provide a clear framework of the necessity of their promotion and further development. Depending on the different jurisdictions of the states, the opinion regarding the duties, rights and obligations of the parties in the process of ADR is different between each of this means and different regarding the domestic courts. In most legal systems the role of the conciliator, arbitrator or mediator it is simply to try to bring the parties together. For example, the proposed possibility of arbitration to withdraw the disputes from the jurisdiction of national courts is extremely beneficial to investment attractiveness. All this led to the exponential growth of bilateral and regional agreements for the protection and promotion of foreign investment, where one of the main provisions is the possibility of transmitting disputes between investors and the state of international arbitration. The sources of the law of ADR lie in a number of international conventions, international model laws and model rules, and institutional rules. To these may be added domestic legislation, reports of awards and academic writings. An arbitrator or mediator is described as ‘a disinterested person, to whose judgment and decision matters in dispute are referred and must act in accordance with the rules of natural justice. Mediation practitioners point to a number of advantages which the mediation process has over the domestic court. In fact, it must be acknowledged that ADR usually takes place when at least one of the parties is unreasonable. Helping the parties to see the reason is a useful social role. The difference between this methods of resolving disputes would be so that the purpose of a conciliator, mediator or arbiter, would be to encourage the parties themselves to understand what benefits they can get from resolving the case out of court in which way they deem most appropriate. Historical scientific methods are used in this research. The theory part it is presented with concrete cases from practice of both judicial and non-judicial ways of resolving conflicts, logical system, method of analysis and synthesis. In this paper as well are used formal-legal and comparative-legal methods. The writing is guided by the provisions of the conceptual theory of international arbitration law and domestic law. Research methods were used, of simple presentation of facts to argue the concrete point of view and the characteristics of the clarification of this research.