Abstract

Gene therapies (GTs) often lack comparators in their pivotal clinical trials when they first seek market access, especially when targeting rare diseases where only symptomatic treatment exists. Furthermore, rare diseases represent a challenge in terms of patient population and clinical trial sample size. Therefore, GT manufacturers resort to single-arm trials and develop indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) for health technology assessment (HTA). Our aim is to understand HTA bodies’ evidence requirements for ITCs for GTs, and identify key drivers and limitations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.