HR+/HER2- Breast cancer: The effect of online education on clinician knowledge, competence, and confidence in monitoring, mitigating toxicities, and developing patient-centric plans using a team-based approach.

Abstract

e12522 Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors provide effective treatment options for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC), but adherence and persistence can be challenging. To address this gap, a global educational activity was developed that consisted of a 2-hour live streaming virtual meeting with interactive workshops and a 45-minute online enduring activity. The objective of this study was to assess the educational impact of the online enduring educational activity. Methods: To assess educational impact a repeated-pairs pre-/post-assessment study design using 3 knowledge/competence questions, in which everyone served as their own control. A paired samples t-test assessed mean differences in average number of correct responses pre- to post-assessment, and a McNemar’s test assessed significance of improvement in single questions from pre- to post-assessment. P values < .05 are statistically significant. Confidence was also assessed using a pre/post confidence question. The activity launched on June 4, 2021, and data was collected till March 30, 2022. Results: 80 oncologists from outside the US (OUS) and 69 oncologists from the US who answered all the assessment questions were included in the analysis. Each question assessed a learning objective. All three knowledge/competence learning objectives showed a significant improvement in the OUS oncologist group, and 2 of the 3 showed a significant improvement in the US group. Conclusions: This online enduring activity resulted in a significant improvement of oncologists’ knowledge and competence related to clinical evidence for the use of CDK4/6i, managing adverse events associated with CDK4/6i and monitoring patients on CDK4/6i. Confidence of oncologists in counselling patients on the importance of adherence to CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy also improved in 29% of OUS oncologists and 33% of US oncologists. However, there is still a need for education in a significant percentage of both OUS and US oncologists on this topic. [Table: see text]