Abstract

BackgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization (HPV E6/E7 RNAscope) appears to be a sensitive and specific technique in detecting transcriptionally active HPV. We aimed to examine the diagnostic utility of this technique in endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA), to explore the prognostic factors for ECA patients and develop a clinically useful nomogram based on clinicopathological parameters to predict it.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 200 patients with ECA who had undergone surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2010 and 2014. The diagnostic performance of HPV E6/E7 RNAscope were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A prognostic nomogram model including HPV E6/E7 RNAscope was generated based on multivariate Cox regression analysis, then we compared the predictive accuracy of the prognostic model with FIGO staging and treatment using concordance index (C-index), time-dependent ROC (tdROC), and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsThe sensitivity and specificity of HPV E6/E7 RNAscope for distinguishing HPV-associated adenocarcinoma (HPVA) from non-HPV-associated adenocarcinoma (NHPVA) in the whole cohort were 75.8% and 80%, respectively. According the univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis, age, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), lymph node involvement (LNI), and HPV E6/E7 RNAscope were valuable predictive factors for OS. These parameters were incorporated into the nomogram model (nomogram A) compared with FIGO stage and treatment. The C-index of nomogram A for predicting OS was 0.825, which was significantly higher than FIGO stage (C-index = 0.653, p = 0.002) and treatment (C-index = 0.578, p < 0.001).Conclusions HPV E6/E7 RNAscope is highly specific for ECA, and the 4-variable nomogram showed more accurate prognostic outcomes in patients with ECA.

Highlights

  • Endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA) accounts for 15%– 20% of all cervical carcinomas

  • In situ detection of Human papillomavirus (HPV) E6/E7 mRNA using the RNAscope appears to be a sensitive and a specific method; we aimed to investigate the potential prognostic utility of this technique in endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA)

  • Diagnostic performance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization in ECA compared to other assays

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA) accounts for 15%– 20% of all cervical carcinomas. Studies have shown that ECA is increasingly reported in young women [1], with a projected 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of only 20.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.2–27.1%) compared to the squamous type (31.3%, 95%CI: 29.2–33.3%) [2]. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system is the gold standard for predicting. Luo et al Cancer Cell International (2021) 21:643 outcomes in patients with ECA, and the mainstay treatment of advanced ECA is concurrent chemoradiotherapy. ECA patients with the same FIGO stage can have marked heterogeneities in their outcomes [3, 4]. The new FIGO 2018 amendments put forward by the gynecological oncology committee agree that staging is an ongoing process informed by data on prognosis and survival, and treatment should be individualized and not merely based on staging given the variability of the resource across regions. We aimed to examine the diagnostic util‐ ity of this technique in endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA), to explore the prognostic factors for ECA patients and develop a clinically useful nomogram based on clinicopathological parameters to predict it

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call