Abstract

Symptoms of occluded aortic bifurcation are variable and consequently lead to the question "How urgent is the operation?". The diagnostic and therapeutic procedure is analysed retrospectively in 6 patients. The reason for the occlusion was thrombosis or embolism in 3 patients each. A successful bilateral inguinal thrombembolectomy was the standard operative revascularisation. In 2 of 3 emergency cases with critical ischemia the operation was performed without preoperative imaging. 3 patients with non-critical ischemia were operated upon more than 12 hours after rising symptoms. How urgent the operation is depends primarily on the extent of occlusion. In case of critical ischemia a revascularisation can be performed without angiography. However, a more extensive procedure, even a bifemoral bifurcation graft, must be taken into account.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.