Abstract
Discoveries in Charles Darwin’s laboratory led to modern herbicides. Darwin discovered the internal mechanism that directed plants to grow toward sunlight and sources of water. Scientists in Europe and America later called this mechanism a plant’s hormone response system. Administrators and scientists, including Dr. Ezra J. Kraus, the Head of the Botany Department at the University of Chicago and a plant physiologist, suggested on the eve of WWII that weed killers had significant military value as chemical weapons. Dr. Kraus obtained access to a synthetic chemical, 2,4-D, and found that when the chemical was absorbed through the leaves of plants, it destroyed a plant’s hormones. After exposure, the plant experienced rapid and uncontrolled growth, and then the leaves shriveled, died and fell off. Dr. Kraus obtained funding for his Department of Botany research program from Department of Defense (DOD) during World War II (WWII). Camp Detrick (Biological Weapons Laboratory) scientists later obtained samples of newly created 2,4,5-T which contained unknown amounts of the by-product dioxin TCDD. In the 1950s and 1960s, Fort Detrick military scientists formulated the herbicide Agent Orange, which was a 50 - 50 mixture of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. These dual purpose herbicides were used by DOD and USDA. American and European farmers in the 1940s used 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T to eliminate weeds from pastureland and cropland. After WWII, synthetic herbicides (and pesticides) development continued in tandem with production of synthetic fertilizers and breeding of high-yield plant varieties. These new agricultural products were then shipped worldwide to increase crop yields, as part of the Green Revolution. This new system of agricultural technologies was intended to eliminate global starvation and increase food security by increasing field and farm crop yields. In contrast, the goal of military use of herbicides, as chemical weapons, was to defoliate jungle forests and destroy food crops as a strategy to win battles and wars. The primary objective of this research study is to describe how agricultural herbicides became tactical chemical weapons. A current assessment will address the environmental impacts of military and environmental chemical weapons on the United States and Vietnam ecosystems and need for additional dioxin TCDD hotspot clean-up efforts.
Highlights
The origins of the herbicides 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) and 2,4,5-T (2,4,5-Trichorophenoxyacetic acid) begins with one of Charles Darwin’s 1880 biological theories [1] on the power of plant movement
Being the first to recognize the military value of herbicides, even before United States (U.S.) military officers, Dr Ezra Kraus was the father of the development of agricultural herbicides as chemical weapons
When the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forest Service decided to accept the transfer of the Department of Defense (DOD) stockpiled of Agent Orange stored at Fort Kelly, the Forest Service may have assumed the Agent Orange had the same formulation, was same product, and would have the same environmental impact as commercially available Agent Orange and components
Summary
The origins of the herbicides 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) and 2,4,5-T (2,4,5-Trichorophenoxyacetic acid) begins with one of Charles Darwin’s 1880 biological theories [1] on the power of plant movement. When 2,4-D was combined with 2,4,5-T (and the contaminant dioxin TCDD) the herbicide Agent Orange was formulated. Agent Orange, used during the Vietnam War, was a synthetic plant growth regulator comprised of equal amounts of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid C8H6Cl2O3 (2,4-D) and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid C8H5Cl3O3 (2,4,5-T). Dr Kraus, a plant physiologist and Head of the Department of Botany at the University of Chicago, suggested in 1940 (on the eve of WWII) that weed killers had significant military value as chemical weapons. Being the first to recognize the military value of herbicides, even before United States (U.S.) military officers, Dr Ezra Kraus was the father of the development of agricultural herbicides as chemical weapons. 2. Scientists, Universities, Agencies, Chemical Companies and Institutions Who Helped to Convert Agricultural Herbicides to Military Chemical Weapons
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.