Abstract
Donald Trump’s use of Twitter was unprecedented. Many of Trump’s strong statements in reference to the U.S. oil & gas industry were intended to advertise his domestic policy agenda aimed at supporting re-industrialization and investment. Did his Twitter messages actually reach domestic oil producers, refiners and transport operators, or rather speculators willing to financially gamble on new information sources? To answer, we look at the WTI-Brent spread, which commonly reflects supply bottlenecks in the U.S. crude oil sector. We use a nonlinear modelling approach where Trump’s tweets are allowed to impact the persistence of market volatility regimes. We find that some of his tweets increase the likelihood of wider spreads, undermining the global status of the WTI benchmark. There is also a negative market impact on proxies for liquidity and speculative activity. Policy recommendations are outlined to counteract the consequences of market speculative behaviour driven by political noise.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
