Abstract
In ALLC Journal Vol 1 No1, A Q Morton described some experiments in which he claimed that the counting of once-occurring words in different positions offers a simple and reliable test of authorship In Vol 2 No 3 M W A Smith refutes this claim, and in 8 pages of detailed criticism and reassessment of Morton's data concludes that there is no evidence to recommend Morton's procedures. Lay (i.e non-statistical) readers may well be bemused by argument over what should presumably be indisputable numerical facts The fact that such a dispute can occur raises questions of how articles whose substance depends on the reported outcome of statistical analysis should be read. This article discusses some of these issues in general terms and uses the two articles in question for the purposes of illustration, rather than in a spirit of criticism per se
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
