Abstract

Oceans, seas, and marine resources are highly relevant for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Such relevance has given rise to the blue economy approach, where scholars and policymakers see activities carried out in cargo ports from a different perspective. The blue economy approach stresses the emergence of multiple transnational networks in relation to these topics and the development of green ports plus environmental measurements at seaports in general. In this context, our study aimed to review the various scientifically documented methods for measuring environmental performance in ports, ports companies, or port authorities in the maritime transport and inland waterways framework. The study followed a scientometric meta-analytic methodology to accomplish its goals. The study strictly referred to the Environmental Performance in Ports (EPP) and extracted the corpus to analyze data held in five databases embedded in the Web of Science Core Collection. Then, the selection was processed and refined with the PRISMA guidelines to establish the eligibility criteria for articles with the PICOS (Population, Interventions, Comparators, Outcomes, and Study) tool. A limited study set was identified. This included port environmental performance indicators and studies that were strongly influenced by the European Sea Ports Organization and Green Marine networks. These were compared based on the ecological Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), scale structure, and diversity in application. Finally, we assessed two measurement forms documented in the scientific research on the subject at a global level and discussed their pros and cons.

Highlights

  • As for the environmental factors, the Sustainable Development Goals were emphasized, these are the product of the indicators included on Life Below Water

  • EcoPorts [42,61,65,66], which, in terms of measurement complexity and analysis possibilities, highlights the aspect of Green Marine Environmental Program (GMEP) in the instruments applied by Walker [67]

  • A strong limitation to the widespread study of indicators in the port field is distinguishing the measurements of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) from those strictly associated with SDG 14 (Life Below Water): the same water cycle, coastal geomorphology, the large number of effluents present in coastal areas and inland waterways, the recirculation of this resource for human or industrial consumption, and the hydro social cycle

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Along with human development and economic growth, free access, and the use of the ocean for resources and services have put strong pressure on marine systems due to practices such as overfishing and increased resource extraction and disruption of coastal areas by various types of pollution [1,2]. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4035 as overfishing and illegal fishing, whether undeclared or within the rules, threaten the capacity of developing countries [3]. In this context, a specific Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) was developed for oceans, seas, and marine resources to provide guidance in the conservation and use of this environmental resource. An initial framework of agreement was constructed, which contains policies, strategies, and models for sustainable development, installing the challenge of advancing from implementation towards sustainability strategy execution [4]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call