Abstract

Autonomous vehicle technology increasingly allows drivers to turn their primary attention to secondary tasks (e.g., eating or working). This dramatic behavior change thus requires new input modalities to support driver–vehicle interaction, which must match the driver’s in-vehicle activities and the interaction situation. Prior studies that addressed this question did not consider how acceptance for inputs was affected by the physical and cognitive levels experienced by drivers engaged in Non-driving Related Tasks (NDRTs) or how their acceptance varies according to the interaction situation. This study investigates naturalistic interactions with a fully autonomous vehicle system in different intervention scenarios while drivers perform NDRTs. We presented an online methodology to 360 participants showing four NDRTs with different physical and cognitive engagement levels, and tested the six most common intervention scenarios (24 cases). Participants evaluated our proposed seven natural input interactions for each case: touch, voice, hand gesture, and their combinations. Results show that NDRTs influence the driver’s input interaction more than intervention scenario categories. In contrast, variation of physical load has more influence on input selection than variation of cognitive load. We also present a decision-making model of driver preferences to determine the most natural inputs and help User Experience designers better meet drivers’ needs.

Highlights

  • IntroductionPublisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

  • We explore the results with a hierarchical approach to identify factors in regard to how drivers’ preferences of input interaction are affected by the Non-driving Related Tasks (NDRTs) and the intervention scenario

  • We conducted an online video-based survey, where we focus on the relatively new environment for the fully autonomous vehicle (FAV) to determine the most possible natural input interactions that match the driver’s in-vehicle activities and the interaction situation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Driven largely by the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI), means that vehicle operation is no longer the driver’s primary task [1,2]. As vehicle automation levels rise from the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Level 0. (no automation/the driver is fully responsible for driving) to Level 5 (fully autonomous vehicle), drivers are able to relinquish more vehicle control and engage in Non-Driving

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.