How to implement the anti-inflammatory reliever treatment proposed by the Global Initiative for Asthma in low- and middle-income countries

Abstract

There are no plausible arguments to consider that the best evidence-based asthma treatment should be different in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A few decades ago, the recognition of asthma as an inflammatory disease of the airways positioned the inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as the cornerstone of the treatment of this disease, maintaining bronchodilators, especially the short-acting beta-agonists (SABA), as symptom-reliever medications for use as needed. However, adherence to regular use of ICS is very low, especially in LMICs, favoring the overuse of SABA, which has been related to an excess of exacerbations and mortality. Recently, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) strategy has recommended the mandatory use of ICS every time a bronchodilator is used as needed (for symptoms relief), whether only as needed or with a background of regular dose of ICS, and has named it: anti-inflammatory reliever (AIR) therapy. This form of therapy, which has been related to a significant reduction of asthma exacerbations, is very attractive for LMICs where patients do not have guaranteed a proper medical follow-up and the access to on-the-counter medications is high. However, the implementation of AIR therapy in LMICs will face many of the already recognized barriers for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma in these countries, especially related to limited access to care in very different health systems, low education level of patients and communities, insufficient health personnel training in asthma in primary care, the unfordable cost of medications, and the lack of political commitment. This review analyzes some of these challenges and strategies for facing them in LMICs.