Abstract

BackgroundProsthetic joints are at risk of becoming infected during an episode of bacteremia, especially during Staphylocococcus aureus bacteremia. However, it is unclear how often asymptomatic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) occurs, and whether additional diagnostics should be considered.MethodsIn this multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with a late acute (hematogenous) PJI between 2005–2015 who had concomitant prosthetic joints in situ. Patients without at least 1 year of follow-up were excluded.ResultsWe included 91 patients with a hematogenous PJI and 108 concomitant prosthetic joints. The incident PJI was most frequently caused by Staphylococcus aureus (43%), followed by streptococci (26%) and Gram-negative rods (18%). Of 108 concomitant prosthetic joints, 13 were symptomatic, of which 10 were subsequently diagnosed as a second PJI. Of the 95 asymptomatic prosthetic joints, 1 PJI developed during the follow-up period and was classified as a “missed” PJI at the time of bacteremia with S. aureus (1.1%). Infected prosthetic joints were younger than the noninfected ones in 67% of cases, and prosthetic knees were affected more often than prosthetic hips (78%).ConclusionsDuring an episode of hematogenous PJI, concomitant asymptomatic prosthetic joints have a very low risk of being infected, and additional diagnostic work-up for these joints is not necessary.

Highlights

  • Prosthetic joints are at risk of becoming infected during an episode of bacteremia, especially during Staphylocococcus aureus bacteremia

  • Patients with a prosthetic joint in situ are at risk for developing a late acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) at a rate of approximately 0.07% per life year of the prosthesis, with the highest risk observed in knees [6]

  • It is well established that an additional diagnostic work-up and early surgical debridement are required in symptomatic joints with a high clinical suspicion of PJI, but it is unclear how an asymptomatic joint should be approached in this regard

Read more

Summary

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with a late acute (hematogenous) PJI between 2005–2015 who had concomitant prosthetic joints in situ. Patients without at least 1 year of follow-up were excluded. A PJI was defined according to the adapted diagnostic criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society [17], requiring at least 2 positive, intraoperative tissue cultures with phenotypically identical microorganisms. Patients with a sinus tract, culture-negative PJIs, and a follow-up of less than 1 year were excluded. Patients were included in the final analysis if they had at least 1 other concomitant prosthetic joint in situ at the time of clinical presentation. Variables relating to patient characteristics, clinical presentation, diagnostics, microbiology, surgical intervention, antibiotic treatment, and outcome were collected and analyzed

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call