Abstract
The article critically reviews the current methodologies for determination of apparent activation energy of structural relaxation, ∆h*, in the glass transition range. Tool–Narayanaswamy–Moynihan phenomenological model was used to simulate data for all major types of relaxation behavior, which were consequently evaluated in terms of the tested methodologies (curve-fitting, evaluation of ∆h* from intrinsic cycles and evaluation of ∆h* from constant heating rate cycles). Advantages and disadvantages of particular methodologies are demonstrated and thoroughly discussed. In addition, effects of various data-distortive effects influencing determination of glass transition activation energy are demonstrated and described. The discussed data-distortive effects include presence thermal gradients, improperly designed temperature programs, incorrectly applied subtractions of the thermokinetic background, or inability of the DSC instrument to perform high cooling/heating rates. Detailed guide for correct determination of ∆h* from DSC measurements is introduced.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
